Phoenicians in Utah
Home Up Ancient Stones Ogam in California Phoenicians in Utah BABY ROCK A Wall Unseen Two Ogams


Phoenicians in Utah


In the summer of 1983 I was becoming seriously interested in the Epigraphic Society and the work it was doing.   I had found a subject profoundly worth attention, and a group of people I could genuinely look up to.  That summer I signed on for a conference in Salt Lake City, and for an extended field trip to eastern Utah.  The trip was to the Fremont site located in the northeastern corner of the state. 

Most archeologists would admit there is not much known for sure about the Fremont culture.  They are believed to have been a hunting and gathering society, which appeared from nowhere and which vanished for reasons unknown.  They lived in various parts of the Great Basin from sometime around 500 BCE until as recently as 500 years ago.   While they were here, they created a great deal of art work painted on the sides of cliffs, as well as a few smaller artifacts.  Although mainly hunter-gatherers, they are given credit for growing corn and for making pottery.  

There has been a lot of speculation among epigraphers that the Fremont may have been related to a Middle Eastern culture.  This idea is based on a similarity in style in their artwork, as well as the use of particular symbols often found in Egypt and North Africa. 

I was intrigued by the Fremont murals.  They seemed to be trying to tell us something, in as powerful a voice as they could muster.  It was as if we were looking at a huge signed headed "READ THIS," but written in a forgotten language. 

For some reason, I was especially intrigued by one large rock painting which seemed to demand attention.  This is what it looked like:

Here we have a trapezoid-shaped humanoid figure, placed about 100 feet above the valley floor, drawn on a sheer rock wall.  The artist must have either used a wood scaffold or dangled from a rope.  The figure is pecked into the rock surface.  That is, a small, hard stone was pounded with a hammer to remove a surface layer of rock a little at a time, revealing a lighter color beneath.  This must have taken many days (the figure is about life-size).

Now please examine the two symbols on either side of the trapezoid man.  Here are close-ups:


These two details are what most intrigued me.  No one in our group had any ideas about their meaning.  The symbol on the left (the figure's right) reminded me of a Chinese ideogram.  I quickly rejected this idea on the grounds there are no other symbols in the area that look Chinese.  The other symbol is a "Y" shape on a horizontal platform.  There is a dot on each side, with a row of four dots on the right.  Usually dots like these indicate numbers when found in pictographs.  Also notice the man's left hand.  This might be seen as simply a crude representation of a hand - except that it has six fingers.  Also, notice how it's formed - a cross with an arc across it, and another line coming from the arc.  This looked deliberate to me.  The other hand is less clear, but is formed in a similar manner, except it has only five fingers. 

Another thing to notice - the object above and to the right of the "Y."  It's shaped like a bowl or semicircle with a rectangle above.  Does this look to you like a sailing ship?  The more I stare at it, the more it resembles a ship.  There's even a natural, horizontal fracture in the rock which could represent the waterline.  But then, I must admit, my imagination may be getting away with me. 

The "Y" symbol looked familiar - I had a feeling I had seen something like it before.  In fact, it is found in numerous other places around this rock art site.  Here is one typical panel:

Here the symbol is repeated three times.  Each has a single dot on each side, while each has a semicircle composed of nine dots above.  In some other places in this area, the sign is found singly.  (One member of our group remarked facetiously that they probably represented champagne glasses, with bubbles rising.)  

I came away feeling somehow dissatisfied that none of our epigraphic experts could read the writing on these walls.  This particular symbol - the "champagne glass" stuck in my mind.  I continued reading journals and publications on epigraphy and archeology.  My attention was drawn to other subjects, but I never quite forgot the champagne glasses.  They were to remain a mystery, to me at least, for the next six years.  In 1989 I received my copy of Volume 18 of ESOP, or Epigraphic Society Occasional Publications.  In this volume was an article by Dr Ali Akbar Bushiri, of Bahrain University.  

Dr Bushiri is a real scientist, who examines the evidence rather than relying on the opinions of others.  The title of his article in ESOP was The Reconstructive Writing System of the Dilmun Culture.  The civilization of Dilmun, or Tilmun, was located in what is now Bahrain.  When Dr Bushiri began working, not much was known about that society.  Other experts were of the opinion that Dilmun did not have a written language, and that it was no older than 2400 BCE.  Dr Bushiri found a written language in surviving Dilmun seals and was able to show how it evolved from simple picture writing, to ideograms and finally to cuneiform on clay tablets.  And he maintained that Dilmun must be at least a thousand years older than previously thought.  

It was in Dr Bushiri's article that I finally found my champagne glasses.  Here is one example:

This symbol represents the name "Inanna."  In the pantheon of ancient Sumer and Dilmun, Inanna was the goddess of love and fertility, among other qualities.  In other regions she is known as Ishtar, Isis, Venus, Tanith, Aphrodite.  She has numerous aspects and is a complex and interesting goddess.   Dr Bushiri refers to a "reconstructive" writing system, because symbols are built up from simpler basic elements to form compound words.  In this case, there are three elements - a circle, meaning "sky," a triangle, meaning "female," and three half circles which together mean "mountains."  Thus, we get "Lady, Queen of the mountains in Heaven."  

The various elements melt together to form a single sign.  The three half circles become a single crescent.  The triangle turns into a vertical bar, while the circle remains intact.  This is not the only symbol for Inanna.  In fact, as of the time of writing his ESOP article Dr Bushiri had discovered 52 separate signs for the same name. Here's another example:

In this case, the circle meaning "sky" has been replaced with a horizontal bar, which has evolved from the grid sign meaning "temple," or "worship."  Thus, "Worship of the Lady of the mountain." 

Here are some other drawings from Dr Bushiri's article:

As you can see, a recurring shape is a vertical bar with an upturned crescent.  There may or may not be additional elements.  After reading this article, I wrote to Dr Bushiri in Bahrain.  I included a copy of my picture of the trapezoid man, with the Inanna figure.  In due course, Dr Bushiri graciously responded.  He agreed that the crescent symbol does resemble one of the names of Inanna.  To my disappointment, he was not able to identify the symbol on the other side of the trapezoid man.  However, I was convinced that we had found a major clue to understanding the Fremont People.  

Please look again at the panel of the three "champagne glasses."  Each has a dot on either side, with a semicircle above made up of nine dots.  I must confess I don't know the meaning of the dots, except that the number nine had various magical meanings in ancient cultures.  According to Dr Bushiri, the number representing Inanna was eight, since she was represented by the planet Venus, whose symbol was an eight-pointed star.  Did the eight somehow transmogrify to nine?  I couldn't say, but a study of Dr Bushiri's material reveals that the writing system of Dilmun was constantly changing and evolving, while retaining certain basic elements.  

I do not mean to suggest that the Fremonts were from Dilmun or Bahrain.  I do think they were descendants of Phoenicians.  There is a great deal of material to establish the presence of Phoenicians in the New World - too much to list here.  The Phoenicians (or Punics) were never a single nation, but rather a group of city states and ethnic groups united by common interests, related languages, and similar religions.  Their empire reached its peak during the reign of Carthage, which was finally destroyed by the Romans in 146 BC after many years of war.  The Punics were the greatest seafarers, merchants and innovators of their time; during the late Bronze Age they controlled the world's supply of copper, tin, and other metals.  They are often credited with inventing the first alphabet.  At least they did use the same alphabet from which Arabic, Hebrew, Greek and Latin scripts are derived.  Much of their religion, myth, symbolism and other cultural traits can be traced back to ancient Sumer - by way of Dilmun.  

Crossing the Atlantic would have been a relatively easy voyage for the Punics.  They embarked on much longer voyages, circumnavigating Africa.  How did some of them end up in Utah?  There are many traces of Punic culture in Mexico.  In ancient times, the Rio Grande had far more water in it than it does now.  It would have been easy sailing for early explorers or traders to take the river as far as the middle of what is now Colorado.  Utah is not far to the west.  I envision a small group that wandered north from Mexico and decided, for some reason, to stay there.  They found plenty of game and good weather.  Best of all, they were not confronted with Roman armies trying to kill them.  If the Anasazi Indians were hostile, there were probably not many of them and they were not as well organized or armed.  

Inanna's sign is by no means the only clue linking the Fremont with Punic culture.  I don't wish to repeat here what other writers have put forth in greater detail.  I will, however, present one more symbol which appears to me directly related to the work of Dr Bushiri:

It may not be clear from this image, but this is the corner of a rock cliff.  The corner runs vertically between the humanoid figure on the right and the maze-like glyph above the tree.  This panel contains a number of interesting elements.  Examine the humanoid in the center.  Notice that he is composed of a rectangle with two upturned crescents on top, with a dot or small circle inside.  Now look at Dr Bushiri's illustration above - you will find at least two or three figures made up of the same elements.  The other humanoid also has a crescent and dot for a head.  The beetle-like figure on the left has the same motif.  Below the beetle is a picture of two human footprints.  Although not reproduced here, the human foot is another frequently used "word" in Dilmun writing.  (Its exact meaning is not clear.)  Notice the man in the center has five fingers on one hand with four on the other, which make nine.  

I believe these figures are related to Inanna worship, although there has apparently been some further evolution of the Dilmun writing system.  The figures obviously are male.  Perhaps they represent high priests in service of the Goddess?  There is also a wriggling horizontal line directly above the figure on the right.  In Dilmun, this represented a serpent, symbol of wisdom and of immortality.  

Finally, look at the glyph in the lower right, partly obscured by the tree.  Here's a close-up.

The object at the bottom, below the man, consists of an arc above an ovoid figure.  Below is the semicircle of nine dots.  At the left and right are two branch-like shapes.  Now compare this glyph with a few figures from Dr Bushiri's article:

Notice the figure in the upper left corner.  This is basically a horizontal bar with branches at each end.  This symbol means "an orchard."  When combined with the symbol for Inanna, it means "Lady of the Orchard," or "Lady of the Date Palms," another of the Queen of Heaven's titles.  Among Her other heavenly jobs, she was a fertility goddess.  Now, the horizontal bar in this case means "Earth."  In another Dilmun variant, Earth is an oval shape with lines across it.  



In my own opinion, the "orchard"  motif may explain the dot on each side of the first symbol we examined.  The tree or branch on each side may have evolved to a simple dot.  This would be consistent with the way in which Dilmun writing was reconstructed, or evolved.  I believe the key to understanding the pictograms of the Fremont culture is to be found in Bahrain - and possibly also in related forms of Middle Eastern writing.  A great deal more could be documented and written about these wonderful pictures in Utah - but I will leave that work to those with more time and wisdom than myself.  


For more about the Southwest and stones that speak, be sure to visit:  The Orion Zone.